UNDERSTANDING THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

**Understanding the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law**

In the realm of legal proceedings, particularly during jury trials, there exists a powerful tool known as the "Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law" (MJOL). This procedural device allows a party to seek a judgment from the court on the grounds that the opposing party has failed to present legally sufficient evidence to warrant a decision by the jury.

**What is a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law?**

An MJOL, historically known as a "directed verdict," is a request made to the court to issue a judgment without the need for a jury's deliberation. This motion is typically filed after one party has been fully heard but before the case is submitted to the jury. The premise of the MJOL is that no reasonable jury could find for the opposing party based on the evidence presented.

**Legal Basis and Timing**

The legal basis for an MJOL is found in Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure¹. The motion must be made before the case is submitted to the jury and must specify the judgment sought, along with the law and facts that entitle the movant to such a judgment.

**Renewed Motion After Trial**

If the court does not grant the initial MJOL, the movant may file a renewed motion, also known as a "judgment notwithstanding the verdict" or JNOV, after the trial. This renewed motion must be filed within 28 days after the entry of judgment¹.

**Strategic Considerations**

Filing an MJOL can be a strategic move in a trial. It forces the court to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence and can potentially streamline the legal process by avoiding unnecessary jury deliberations. However, it also requires a clear and compelling argument that the evidence, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, cannot support a verdict for that party.

**Conclusion**

The Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is a critical aspect of the judicial process, providing a mechanism for the court to uphold the law when the evidence does not support a jury's decision. Understanding when and how to utilize this motion is essential for legal practitioners who wish to navigate the complexities of trial advocacy effectively.