**Understanding the Motion to Mold the Verdict: A Legal Insight**
In the intricate dance of the courtroom, where every step is guided by the rule of law, the "Motion to Mold the Verdict" plays a pivotal role in ensuring that justice is not only served but also accurately reflected in the court's records. This motion is a post-trial mechanism that attorneys may employ to correct or clarify a jury's verdict to ensure it aligns with the legal and factual determinations made during the trial.
### The Essence of the Motion
A Motion to Mold the Verdict is typically filed when a party believes that the verdict rendered by the jury does not accurately represent the jury's intentions or contains a clerical error. It is a request to the trial judge to amend the verdict in a manner that reflects what the jury intended to award or decide, without altering the substantive decision of the jury.
### Legal Precedents and Applications
The motion is grounded in the principle that a verdict should mirror the precise legal consequences of the jury's findings. For instance, in the case of *Getting vs. Mark Sales and Leasing, Inc.*, the plaintiffs filed a Motion to Mold the Verdict to correct the defendant's name as it was inconsistently recorded, thereby ensuring the verdict accurately targeted the correct entity¹.
Similarly, in a federal case in Pennsylvania, a defendant's Motion to Mold the Verdict was denied, while the plaintiff's motion to apply delay damages to compensatory damages was granted, illustrating the court's discretion in molding the verdict to reflect equitable outcomes².
### The Procedure and Outcome
The procedure for filing such a motion is typically governed by state or federal rules of civil procedure. In Pennsylvania, for example, the motion must be filed within a specific time frame after the verdict is entered, as per Pa.R.C.P. 238¹. The court then reviews the motion, considering the arguments and evidence presented, and decides whether to mold the verdict accordingly.
### Conclusion
The Motion to Mold the Verdict is a testament to the legal system's commitment to precision and fairness. It serves as a corrective lens, focusing the blurry lines that may emerge between a jury's decision and the final judgment. As such, it is an essential tool in the arsenal of legal practitioners, safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process and the rights of the parties involved.
Comments